Trending

Judge Wonders ‘Why On Earth’ Trump Lawyers Didn’t Object More To Porn Star’s Testimony

Asks 'Why On Earth' Lawyers Didn't Object More To Porn Star's Testimony

In this courtroom sketch, former President Donald Trump smiles to the jury pool as he is introduced to them at the beginning of his trial over charges that he falsified business records to conceal money paid to silence porn star Stormy Daniels in 2016, in Manhattan state court in New York, Monday, April 15, 2024. (Jane Rosenberg/Pool Photo via AP)

Judge Juan Merchan, who is presiding over former President Donald Trump’s criminal hush money trial, was critical of Trump’s legal team for not objecting more to some of Stormy Daniels’s testimony.

He said there were many moments during her testimony in which the defense team could have objected but chose not to. Merchan, for the second time this week, expressed his confusion with Trump’s team, notably his lawyer Susan Necheles, for not doing so.

Merchan, in response to Trump’s lawyers asking for a mistrial due to some of the testimony, said that “for some unexplained reason that I still don’t understand,” the defense did not object more.

Some of Daniels’s testimony veered off track of the central alleged crime in the case: whether Trump falsified business records. Daniels provided details of her alleged affair with Trump, from details about the hotel room to the material of the pajamas the former president was wearing.

“Why on Earth she [Necheles] wouldn’t object to the mention of a condom, I don’t understand,” Merchan said.

He acknowledged he wished that the prosecution had not asked certain questions regarding the affair, but he ultimately said that there were “many times when Ms. Necheles could have objected but didn’t.”

Read the full story here. 

BACK TO HOMEPAGE