The Christian veteran charged in the beheading of a Satanic statue placed in the Iowa Capitol is seeking to have the hate crime charge against him removed because the Satanic Temple group is not considered a relgion.
In a Friday court filing, attorney Sara Pasquale for Michael Cassidy wrote that the “violation of individual rights” enhancement in the case is inapplicable as well as unconstitutional, according to the Des Moines Register.
Pasquale wrote that the law regarding crimes motivated by “the person’s (victim’s) race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, political affiliation, sex, sexual orientation, age, or disability” was not applicable in Cassidy’s case, as the display was owned by the Satanic Temple and is a legal entity, not an individual that can have a race, sex, disability, or practice a religion.
“It could never be said, save in Wonderland, that Best Buy is Buddhist,” Pasquale wrote.
Pasquale noted that the Satanic Temple is not a religion for the purposes of the statute, as a religion entails “a system of faith and worship,” and the Satanic Temple has specifically said they don’t have “a belief in a personal Satan. She also noted comments made by a temple leader in which it was a “common misconception” that “the Satanic Temple is a theistic religion that worships Satan as an entity.”
“(The Temple’s) own words establish that it is not a religion within the ordinary meaning of religion, as they have no faith, do not worship, and reject the supernatural,” Pasquale wrote. “That they call themselves a religion simply does not make it so.”
Click here to read the full story at the Post Millennial.
